Comparing Fluent (FLNT) and Salon Media Group (SLNM)

Fluent (NASDAQ:FLNT) and Salon Media Group (OTCMKTS:SLNM) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

Fluent has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Salon Media Group has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Fluent and Salon Media Group’s gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Fluent $220.27 million 1.34 -$53.20 million ($0.72) -5.43
Salon Media Group $4.57 million 0.99 -$9.57 million N/A N/A

Salon Media Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fluent.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Fluent and Salon Media Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fluent 0 0 1 0 3.00
Salon Media Group 0 0 0 0 N/A

Fluent currently has a consensus target price of $4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.30%. Given Fluent’s higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Fluent is more favorable than Salon Media Group.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

15.7% of Fluent shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Salon Media Group shares are held by institutional investors. 18.7% of Fluent shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 83.9% of Salon Media Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Fluent and Salon Media Group’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fluent -10.70% 1.61% 1.13%
Salon Media Group N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Fluent beats Salon Media Group on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fluent Company Profile

Fluent, Inc. provides data-driven performance marketing and customer acquisition services primarily in the United States. It develops custom audiences and operates performance marketing campaigns on behalf of advertising partners. The company offers data acquisition solutions that include Connect, which enables marketers to acquire consumer data and marketing consent across its network of proprietary Websites; and ReConnect that enables marketers offer consumers the ability to opt into marketing programs outside of the confines of own Websites. It also provides audience solutions that empower to target ads with unprecedented precision and drive qualified prospects at scale; and MobileNow, which offers marketers access to unique mobile Web inventory coupled with the precision targeting capabilities. The company was formerly known as Cogint, Inc. and changed its name to Fluent, Inc. in April 2018. Fluent, Inc. is headquartered in Boca Raton, Florida.

Salon Media Group Company Profile

Salon Media Group, Inc., an Internet media company, operates an online news Website in the United States. It produces a content Website with various subject-specific sections. The company's Salon.com Website features various voices and perspectives; and covers a range of topics, including news, politics, race, religion, arts and culture, entertainment, sustainability, innovation, technology, and business. It also hosts dynamic content, such as video, slideshows, and images. Salon Media Group, Inc. was founded in 1995 and is headquartered in San Francisco, California.

Receive News & Ratings for Fluent Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Fluent and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.


Leave a Reply